“For the trickster, the theme is stronger than fear”

Authors

  • A. G. Asmolov МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова; РАНХиГС; Московский институт психоанализа и Академия потенциала человека СберУниверситета Автор
  • A. R. Efimov ПАО «Сбербанк»; Университет науки и технологий МИСИС Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2078-838X-2024-3-8-20

Keywords:

эффект бабочки, artificial intelligence, trickster, preadaptation, human-centricity, carnival culture, signaling paradigm, weak signals, evolution, Darwinian theory, disruptive selection, the butterfly effect

Abstract

This interview continues Albert Efimov’s series of discussions with scholars about the current state of artificial intelligence, its applications across various fields and tasks, and the ethical and social implications of its development.In the conversation regarding humanity’s place in the modern world, A.G. Asmolov discussed the importance of maintaining diversity within complex systems and managing complexity during their analysis. The dialogue clarified the role of the «contrarian,» the future anthropologist’s work, and how metaphor will drive scientific progress in the age of artificial intelligence.Additional topics addressed include: the significance of tricksters in the search for new ideas and meanings; the reasons we condemn ourselves to a lack of free time and its impact on cognitive abilities; the mismatch between organizational structures created by humans and the levels of tasks and technologies emerging today; the core concepts underlying «human-centric organizations»; whether the development of artificial intelligence will lead to information asymmetry, where everyone knows everything, and the primary risks when humans begin to learn from machines; why AI developers can be seen as a «community of Pygmalions,» and the dangers of «humanizing» machines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Asmolov A.G., Efimov A.R. “For the trickster, the theme is stronger than fear” // Education Policy. 2024. Vol. 1, no. 3. P. 8–20. https://doi.org/10.22394/2078-838X-2024-3-8-20