Pedagogical Strategies for Active Learning: Theory and Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2078-838X-2022-3-18-33Keywords:
педагогическая практика., new educational results, teaching practicesAbstract
This article is devoted to effective teaching strategies and their implementation in the classroom. During the first 20 years of the new millennium, researchers in the educational community have established a consensus on the characteristics of modern education both in terms of its results and on the organization of the educational process (Wyse et al., 2015). However, a new agenda of the "student-centered" educational process did not end with the setting of new educational goals. The problem is not only in adopting new guidelines and shifting the traditional focus in teaching. Such a transformation is possible only if a teacher implements certain pedagogical strategies. This article describes strategies whose effectiveness is based on large international studies (Hatty, 2018, OECD, 2018). Those strategies are the following: setting goals, structuring lessons, open (explicit) teaching, worked examples, collaborative learning, questioning, feedback, metacognitive strategies, differentiated learning, multiple exposures. The main question that arises in connection with the presented models is, of course, the question of their relevance to the practice of Russian schools, i.e. in terms of implementation of a particular pedagogical strategy in real teaching practice. Is it possible for a teacher of a particular discipline to regularly apply any of those strategies working within the framework of the Federal State Educational Standard and the educational program of the school? The article presents examples of how each of the 10 strategies is implemented in different subject-specific lessons and for different stages of learning. All examples illustrate the teaching practice of in-service teachers of three Moscow schools. This article is a collective work of researchers and in-service teachers, which is considered by the authors as one of the options for a professional communication and cooperation.Downloads
References
Гусинский Э. Н., Турчанинова Ю. И. (2003). Введение в философию образования. М.: Логос, 248 с.
Марголис А. А. (2015). Модели подготовки педагогов в рамках программ прикладного бакалавриата и педагогической магистратуры. Психологическая наука и образование, 20(5), 45-64.
Пинская М. А., Михайлова А. М., Рыдзе О. А., Денищева Л. О., Краснянская К. А., Авдеенко Н. А. (2019a). Навыки XXI века: как формировать и оценивать на уроке? Образовательная политика, 3 (79), 50-62.
Пинская М. А., Бысик Н. В., Милкус А. Б., Косарецкий С. Г. (2019b). Поверх барьеров: истории школ, работающих в сложных социальных условиях. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 192 с.
Универсальные компетентности и новая грамотность: от лозунгов к реальности (под ред. М. С. Добряковой, И. Д. Фрумина). (2020). Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 472 с.
Ушинский К. Д. (1867). Человек как предмет воспитания: опыт педагогической антропологии. http://dugward.ru/library/pedagog/ushinskiy_chelovek1.html(дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
Хэтти Дж. (2017). Видимое обучение: синтез более 800 метаанализов, посвященных достижениям школьников. М: Национальное образование, 432 с.
Шляйхер А. (2019). Образование мирового уровня. Как выстроить школьную систему XXI века? Национальное образование, 336 с.
OECD. (2019). Future of Education and Skills 2030. Conceptual learning framework. Learning Compass 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-leaming/leaming/leaming-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_concept_note.pdf (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
Paniagua A., Istance D. (2018). Teachers as Designers of Learning Environments: The Importance of Innovative Pedagogies. Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris, 210 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085374-en.
Peterson A., Dumont H., Lafuente M., Law N. (2018). Understanding innovative pedagogies: key themes to analyse new approaches to teaching and learning. OECD Education Working Papers, 172, Directorate for education and skills. https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/WKP(2018)8&docLanguage=En (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
Schleicher A., Ramos G. (2016). Global competency for an inclusive world. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf.
The Education State. State of Victoria. (2020). High impact teaching strategies. Excellence in Teaching and Learning. https://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/school/teachers/support/high-impact-teaching-strategies.pdf (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).
Ulferts H. (2020). The Relevance of General Pedagogical Knowledge For Successful Teaching: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the international evidence from primary to tertiary education. OECD Education Working Papers, 212. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/ede8feb6en.pdf?expires=1613551791&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=4FAD822BE3470D757446A8B5189B646B/.
World Economic Forum. (2016). New Vision for Education: Fostering Social and Emotional Learning through Technology. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_New_Vision_for_Education.pdf(дата обращения: 15.02.2021).
Wyse D., Hayward L., Pandya J. (2015). The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment. SAGE, 1104 p.